
1-
Terrorism and oil prices
Oil price to remain high in 2006
2- Terrorism
and the global economy
A
sustained increase in the number of terrorism
attacks could have a greater impact on global
economy.
Robin
Bew, Chief Economist,
Economist Intelligence Unit - EIU
Released by Cantos.com
|
1-
Terrorism and oil prices
Oil price to remain high in 2006
Q.
You share the view that the oil price will remain high
in 2006. In fact you've revised your previous predictions
upwards?
A.
Yes, we think that currently prices have hit an all time
high. Brent is trading at over $60 a barrel and we think
it is going to stay at around those levels through the rest
of this year. It should come off a bit in 2006, but the
average for the whole year we think is going to be well
over $50. So that's a very substantial upwards revision
from where we were before, where we were looking for high
$40s. And it's very high relative to the historic average,
which for Brent has really been about $20 a barrel. So it
is a very, very worrying level of energy cost, a real burden
on firms in terms of the pressure they get on their margins
and of course it is a potential inflationary effect, which
central banks around the world are quite worried about.
Q.
How important is China now as an oil user relative to the
US and Japan?
A.
China is now the second biggest oil consumer in the world.
During the course of 2005, we think it is going to be consuming
around 7m barrels a day and that is compared to the US,
which is the biggest consumer at about 21m barrels a day.
So very, very substantial. It consumes about the same as
the big European four economies put together. So China is
a very substantial drain. And of course the other worrying
thing is that China not only is the second biggest consumer
but it is also one of the fastest growing oil markets in
the world. So not only is it consuming a lot now, but it
is going to be consuming considerably more in the future
because oil demand is rising by 5 or 6 per cent a year.
Q.So
will it take over the US as the number one customer?
A.We're
a very long way away from that because it is only about
a third in terms of consumption relative to that of the
US. It would take a very long time for that to happen. But
of course incremental demand, in terms of how much extra
weight or strain it is putting on the oil market every year,
China is probably the most significant player out there.
It really is a very important part of what's driving oil
prices up to these record highs.
Q.Is
that something of a concern to us then?
A.Well
yes. I think if you look at what's going on in the oil market,
up until maybe the mid 1990s India and China weren't really
big drivers in terms of pushing global consumption forwards.
And then when they did start to demand more oil, and it
particularly China but India to is important to some extent,
a lot of the additional supply was coming not from the OPEC
countries but actually from Russia who was bringing a lot
of oil on stream in Siberia. Now Russian production is starting
to plateau and so everyone is looking around to see where
the next sources of oil are going to come from. There hasn't
a lot of investment in OPEC in recent years and so consequently
the market is very tight. There's not a lot of spare capacity.
Opec is running with practically no spare capacity at all
and that means that oil markets become extremely jittery.
And what we're seeing is every time there is any threat
at all of a supply disruption, or any sign at all that demand
is ticking up further in these key markets, prices go through
the roof.
Q.So
would you say that Opec has given up trying to reign in
the oil prices?
A.Well
given up is probably a little bit too strong. But I think
in practical terms there isn't very much they can do. I
mean it is certainly not possible for them to really ramp
up production, flood the market with oiland drive prices
down. That's not really within their grasp any more. They
just don't have the capacity to do it. They're trying to
drive prices down to some extent through statements. So
they're making promises about how perhaps they raise production
quotas going forwards if the price remains very high, or
the market remains very tight. But these statements of course
lack credibility in a world where everyone knows they don't
have a lot of spare capacity. So they're trying, but there's
not really much they can do.
Q.What
are they doing to expand their capacity?
A.We
are seeing increasing investment activity now going on in
Opec. For the last few years oil prices were high, but oil
majors were really assuming that that was temporary, that
price is going to drop back. A lot of the investment is
having to go into areas where the extraction costs are a
little bit higher and perhaps if prices did revert to $20
they wouldn't be profitable. Now, of course, people's expectations
about a long run price have changed and so we are seeing
a lot more investment activity going on within Opec and
also other regions of course. Africa, investment has been
very, very high. Some investment in Latin America. So we
are seeing this, but of course it takes quite a long time
to bring stuff on stream. We will be getting more capacity
on stream in Opec over the course of 2006, but a lot of
the bigger projects that you read about don't really come
on stream until 2007 and some of them not even until 2009.
Saudi talks a very good game. They say that they have plans
to raise their productive capacity by as much as 50% over
the next five or six years. But a lot of that investment
hasn't even been started and it wouldn't come on stream
until the next decade. So in the immediate short term -
the next 18 months, two years - there's not really much
more coming on stream than we're going to be seeing going
off stream through wells being run out, say, in the North
Sea.
Q.You
mentioned Saudi Arabia there. Could the death of King Fahd
lead to any change in oil policy there?
A.It's
quite unlikely. I mean the new king, King Abdullah, has
been effectively ruling the country for the last 10 years
anyway after King Fahd had a stroke. So policy changes probably
not particularly likely. He has been a little bit constrained
over the last decade of course because the King had still
been alive and that does put some brake on his ability to
make reforms. And so I would expect to see perhaps some
acceleration in some of the political reforms that we've
seen, but really not very much. The country is quite unstable.
The terrorist threat is very high. That means it is quite
difficult for anyone in the government there, in the Royal
family, to move forwards without broad-based support and
that takes a lot of time to put together. So I wouldn't
expect to see any great policy changes.
|